The Apple M1's GPU prowess also has an inordinate impact on these test results, with Chrome both native and x86_64 translated on the M1 outrunning Chrome on the Ryzen U powered HP EliteBook. Safari enjoys an absolutely crushing advantage on this test, more than doubling even M1-native Chrome's performance. Chrome x86_64 under Rosetta2 takes a significant back seat to everything else here-though we want to again stress that it does not feel at all slow and would perform quite well compared to nearly any other system.įinally, MotionMark 1.1 measures complex graphic animation techniques in-browser and nothing else. This is the closest thing to a "traditional" outside-the-browser benchmark and is the most relevant for general Web applications of all kinds-particularly heavy office applications such as spreadsheets with tons of columns, rows, and formulae but also graphic editors with local rather than cloud processing. Jetstream2 is the broadest of the three benchmarks and includes workloads for data sorting, regular expression parsing, graphic ray tracing, and more. Speedometer shows a massive advantage for M1 silicon running natively, whether Safari or Chrome Chrome x86_64 run through Rosetta2 is inconsequentially slower than Chrome running on a brand-new HP EliteBook with Ryzen U CPU. This is probably the most relevant benchmark of the three for "regular webpage," if such a thing exists. Go inside M2 Pro and M2 Max M2 Pro M2 Pro brings power to take on even more demanding projects. The first benchmark in our gallery above, Speedometer, is the most prosaic-the only thing it does is populate lists of menu items, over and over, using a different Web-application framework each time. 400GB/s memory bandwidth Introducing the next generation of Apple silicon for pros: The lightning-fast M2 Pro and the extraordinary M2 Max the most powerful and efficient chip ever in a pro laptop. Pro users of M1 Macs have reported disappointing transfer speeds with external SSDs, and tests. dmg is available today, and-as expected-it's significantly faster if you're doing something complicated enough in your browser to notice. Most M1 Mac Thunderbolt 4 ports don’t support the 10Gb/s transfers of USB 3.1 Gen 2, show tests. That was and still is a true statement we find it difficult to believe anyone using the non-native binary for Chrome under an M1 machine would find it "slow." That said, Google's newer, ARM-native. I want a larger screen size and don’t care about cost. For a slight edge on video editing, you might opt for the 13-inch M1 MacBook Pro. Further Reading Hands-on with the Apple M1-a seriously fast x86 competitor In our earlier testing, we declared that the previous version of Google Chrome-which was available only as an x86_64 binary and needed to be run using Rosetta 2-was perfectly fine. From my tests, the 13-inch M1 MacBook Pro or M1 MacBook Air will perform at 7090 of what a nearly-top-spec Intel 16-inch MacBook Pro can offer, so either of those would be phenomenal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |